although the quality may be better on the iMac. That means $400 gets me a not so big TFT screen (far less than $200.
#Dodge ram 3500 dually lifted with stacks mac
it does have more than twice the HD and a slightly faster CPU, but other than that it seems pretty identical to the low end Mac Mini. The low end iMac doesn't has a superdrive, no Front Row remote.
I would definitely recommend a Mini, but since the iMac is so close in the Edu department, it is a little tough for the 1.83 clockspeed. The Mini is still a good computer for a low end price range, even if it isn't the very newest processor available. Even though it's still $599 ($579 Edu) for the low end, it is at least not a solo. Now that the Minis are Core Duo I like it more. I always expected CR to uncover issues with products, not simply ride the media public opinion wave or worse to publish fiction to sell their subscriptions. CR came off on this one like a politician wavering with public opinion. Where was the "non-recommendation" on the first review that rated the iPhone-4 as the best phone ever? That was when it was popular in the media to praise apple - before antenna-gate. They were simply out to take advantage of an opportunity to take wall street's favorite child down in order to get the spotlight. I would respect them much more if they did not recommend previous model iPhones that got worse reception.īut their biased unprofessional review with the reviewer's little demonstration with the masking tape showed their bias and intent. What CR did was take advantage of the media hysteria and jumped on the bandwagon with a review that would put them in the spotlight. Which drops more calls just like other smart phones drop calls. Had it since July 5.Īnd remarkably Consumer Reports recommended the 3GS. With 3GS 30% of my calls were dropped, with iPhone 4, 0%. I can't believe I waffled between 3GS, HTC Incredible, and iPhone 4.
0 kommentar(er)
